Why it matters: Linear’s team reports love async collaboration, but context still fragments across docs.[1] Chaos captures the narrative while Linear ships the work.
TL;DR
- Capture product decisions in Chaos, publish actionable issues to Linear.
- Mirror statuses so demos, storyboards, and delivery stay aligned.
- Audit the sync weekly using the KPI scorecard.
| Chaos action | Linear result | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Tag capture as “Ship it” | Create issue in backlog | Auto-assign to squad lead |
| Update decision log | Comment on linked issue | Maintains rationale history |
| Close Chaos card | Resolve issue | Triggers release notes draft |
Why sync Chaos and Linear?
Chaos captures context, decisions, and research. Linear executes. Syncing them prevents “why” from falling behind “what”.
How do you set up the sync?
Use the integration template: map Chaos tags to Linear teams, configure status mirroring, and authenticate with service tokens. Tie retrospective notes back into the decision log.
How do you measure sync health?
Review weekly: unresolved sync errors, issue ageing, and stakeholder satisfaction. Linear highlights that async teams depend on reliable automations to stay aligned.[1]
Key takeaways
- Chaos keeps strategy visible; Linear keeps execution tight.
- Automated sync rules prevent context drift.
- Regular audits maintain trust across squads.